So I got my 98-280 f/4 L IS lens and I've putting it through the paces lately. Here's our kitty - <img src="http://www.themeparkphotos.us/assets/images/db_images/db_IMG_3591a4.jpg" /> and <img src="http://www.themeparkphotos.us/assets/images/db_images/db_IMG_3592a5.jpg" /> I'm surprised by the quality really. Glad I went that route even though it's heavy. But I'm used to carrying heavy things. Here's the full size image of the bottom image - if you look closely in his eyes you will see the reflection of our dining table. http://www.themeparkphotos.us/assets/im ... 2a2lrg.jpg
Huh? Must be 70-200 f/4L IS after 1.6x APS-C conversion. Although it doesn't explain why it starts at 98mm. ???
okieeee, it's 1.4 crop factor to be exact. Which camera is this? 1DmkII? (I thought that one is 1.3 crop). ??? Don't leave me hanging here. Pleeeeeaze!!! ;D
Which TC do you use and how's the quality with vs without TC? I use Tokina 1.4x TC and the end result is very blurry (well, not very, but compared to w/o TC it's really bad).
Canon's 1.4 II. The cat photo (#2) I posted is with it...very impressed, esp since here's the EXIF: 210mm (hey it's reporting the extended focal length) 1/25 sec f/4 ISO 200 The last time I got a pic without it was the vulture I think. <img src="http://www.themeparkphotos.us/assets/images/db_images/db_IMG_3505a4.jpg" /> But let's see...overcast day...I was shooting from behind a tree (trying not to spook the vulture but get close enough for a halfway decent shot). This one was at 200mm.
I think it's pretty clear I have to get rid of my 1.4x TC and get the Canon version instead. Oy, more money needs to be spent